Colorado Rights Blog

ACLU of Colorado By: ACLU of Colorado 11.7.2013

FAQs: Out of Sight, Out of Mind


Frequently Asked Questions


Q: Why did Sam Mandez go to prison?

A: Sam Mandez was arrested in 1996 for a crime that occurred in 1992, when an elderly woman was murdered inside her home during a burglary. Jurors interviewed after Sam’s conviction stated that they believed Sam broke a window at some point in time that ultimately allowed entry into the woman’s home, but that Sam did not participate in any injury to the woman. Sam was convicted of Felony Murder, which is classified as First-Degree Murder in Colorado. Sam and his counsel continue to maintain his innocence.

Q: If members of the jury thought he did not physically harm the victim, why was he convicted of murder?

A: Simply put, the law states that a felony murder occurs whenever someone dies during the commission of any felony, such as burglary. Burglary means that someone entered a home unlawfully to commit any crime inside. Consequently, Sam’s counsel believe the jury felt compelled to convict Sam of felony murder because they had no other option under the law given their conclusion that Sam at some point had broken a window which allowed others entry into the woman’s home.

Q: How old was Sam at the time of the crime?

A: Sam was fourteen years old at the time of the crime, but he was not arrested until he was eighteen.

Q: Why was Sam sentenced to life without parole as a juvenile?

A: Under Colorado law in 1997, once Sam was convicted of felony murder, the judge had no choice but to sentence him to life without parole. Under the law at the time, the sentencing judge could not consider any mitigating information about Sam, such as his youth, the circumstances of his life, and particularly how the evidence did not suggest he injured anyone. 

Q: Is life without parole for juveniles constitutional?

A: Recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court have placed constitutional limits on sentencing juveniles to life without parole. The Court declared that when a juvenile commits a crime, it violates the Constitution to sentence that juvenile to life without parole if the juvenile did not kill anyone and did not intend to kill any one. Also, prior to sentencing a juvenile to life without parole, the court must first consider mitigating evidence, including the fact of the juvenile’s youth. In concluding that there are constitutional limits on sentencing juveniles to life without parole, the Court relied on scientific evidence differentiating youth from adults. The Court held that youth always remain less culpable than adults, no matter how heinous the crime; that youth always serves as a mitigating factor, and that young people have a heightened capacity for change. The Court also recognized the natural immaturity and recklessness of young people, and that they cannot foresee the consequences of their actions and engage in risky behaviors with peers.

Q: Have Sam’s attorneys appealed the original sentence?

A: Sam’s counsel have challenged Sam’s sentence in the Colorado courts. They believe Sam’s life without parole sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution, and that Sam fits into the category of juveniles unconstitutionally sentenced to life without parole because he did not kill the elderly woman, nor did he intend to.

Moreover, Sam’s attorneys believe the mandatory life without parole sentence for Sam was unconstitutional, because the sentencing court was prohibited from hearing or considering any mitigation in his case, including the fact that Sam was a fourteen years old at the time of the crime.

Q: Why was Sam placed in solitary confinement?

A: Sam was placed in administrative segregation (long-term solitary confinement) in 1998 for non-violent, minor prison rule infractions — participating in a three-way phone call and tampering with a bathroom lock.

Q: Is Sam living in solitary confinement today?

A: Yes, Sam is living in solitary confinement today. In late 2012, Sam was moved out of administrative segregation and into the Colorado Department of Correction’s new Residential Treatment Program (RTP), which purports to provide intensive mental health care to those prisoners with the most significant mental health needs in a setting that avoids the isolating conditions of administrative segregation. Unfortunately, early reports on the RTP show that some seriously mentally ill prisoners – like Sam – are stuck in the lowest levels of the program in a form of isolation almost identical to administrative segregation. For all but one month in the last eleven months in RTP, Sam has spent in excess of 22 hours per day alone in his cell, has taken his meals alone in his cell, has been permitted to leave his cell only in full restraints, and has been denied meaningful human contact. Intensive mental health treatment cannot be provided in solitary confinement, as is evidenced by Sam’s out of cell therapeutic time during his first six months in the program. During that time, Sam received an average of twelve minutes of individual therapy each week and, over a ten week period, received no out-of-cell therapy at all. As Sam’s expert, Dr. Jeffrey Metzner, explained in the film, for Sam to get better, he must get out of solitary confinement and into intensive mental health treatment.



  • Cedric Watkins is a father, uncle, entrepreneur-in-training, and a vital community pillar for many others. While behind bars, he has tirelessly devoted himself to serving his peers and his community. He developed gang disaffiliation programs for other incarcerated individuals and is currently involved with Defy Ventures. He sends letters and calls his daughter as much as he can.

    Cedric is currently in prison at Sterling Correctional Facility. He was convicted of aggravated robbery, burglary, kidnapping, theft and sentenced to 80 years; no one was seriously injured or killed. For comparison, a person convicted of second-degree murder in Colorado faces a maximum sentence of 48 years. Cedric has already served 20 years and has fully rehabilitated during that time.

    It’s time to bring Cedric home: Redemption is real. Clemency is compassion.

  • On November 21, 2016, 13 Aurora police officers responded to a simple noise complaint at Alberto Torres’s home. As happens all too often, Aurora police officers escalated this minor issue into a brutal affair. They beat Mr. Torres solely because he delayed exiting his garage to ask his wife to interpret for him. With that beating, the lives of Mr. Torres and every member of his family were changed and he has yet to recover. ACLU of Colorado fought to obtain justice for Mr. Torres, and Aurora has now paid him $285,000. But money is not justice, and the brutality of the Aurora Police Department against people of color has continued unabated.

    It doesn’t have to be this way.

    Imagine, if instead of 13 officers being dispatched to Mr. Torres’s home for a noise complaint, the City of Aurora sent a civilian-led response team to check on his welfare and ask that he and his friends lower their sound, resulting in a non-violent solution to a minor issue?

    ACLU Settles Case With Aurora After Police Brutalize and Unlawfully Arrest Alberto Torres

  • Hope is a discipline. It’s a commitment that together, we can create a more perfect union. We won’t rest until we fulfill the promise of equal rights for ALL people in the United States.

    Join us in our fight to fulfill this promise and move forward with hope by donating to the ACLU of Colorado. Your donation supports the ACLU’s strengths that make our work effective and collaborative.

    Donate now at

  • Anthony Martinez is 84-years-old and suffering from renal failure, as well as other serious medical conditions including dementia. He is currently incarcerated in the Sterling Correctional Facility, site of one of Colorado’s largest COVID-19 outbreaks with almost 600 active COVID-19 cases. He and his family are understandably terrified that he will catch the virus and die.

    In the midst of this public health crisis, incarcerated people as vulnerable as Anthony, could and should be immediately released to safely live out their remaining years with family.

    Read more about Anthony Martinez and other at-risk incarcerated people.