Colorado Rights Blog


  • Anthony Martinez is 84-years-old and suffering from renal failure, as well as other serious medical conditions including dementia. He is currently incarcerated in the Sterling Correctional Facility, site of one of Colorado’s largest COVID-19 outbreaks with almost 600 active COVID-19 cases. He and his family are understandably terrified that he will catch the virus and die.

    In the midst of this public health crisis, incarcerated people as vulnerable as Anthony, could and should be immediately released to safely live out their remaining years with family.

    Read more about Anthony Martinez and other at-risk incarcerated people. 

  • Ronald Johnson is pre-diabetic, suffers from asthma and high blood pressure, and regularly uses an inhaler to breathe. His age and respiratory ailments put him at risk of serious illness and death if he contracts COVID-19. With over hundreds of active cases in Colorado’s prisons, his family fears he will not make it out alive. His daughter, Amber, says, “In prison, he can’t protect himself and he can’t social distance. My deep fear is that my dad will die in prison. That is an awful, traumatic reality to consider. My chest is tight just thinking about how quickly it spreads and how vulnerable he is.”

    Governor Hickenlooper shortened his sentence following testimony from family, friends and correctional officers advocating for his early release. Yet, he is still eight years away from parole. While he remains in prison, COVID-19 continues to spread. Ronald’s three siblings, four children and four grandchildren are desperate for his release.

    Read more about Ronald Johnson and other at-risk incarcerated people.

  • Tuesday Olson knew her pregnancy was in trouble and tried to access hospital care as soon as possible. But there was a problem: she was in jail. This is her story.
  • It’s time to end the death penalty in Colorado. Family members who lost loved ones to murder speak out against an unjust and broken system.

Catholic Hospital Illegally Interferes with Physician Judgment, Patient Care

November 13, 2013

DENVER – Mercy Regional Medical Center, a Catholic hospital in Durango, is violating state and federal law by prohibiting physicians from discussing the option of pregnancy termination even when continuing the pregnancy threatens a patient’s life, according to a complaint the ACLU sent today to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.

The ACLU’s letter asks the Colorado agency to investigate and intervene to stop the facility, which serves as the sole community hospital in the area, from enforcing its policy and inappropriately interfering with its physicians’ practice of medicine.

“When the medical standard of care would recommend termination, the hospital is inappropriately forcing staff physicians to choose between obeying their employer or following their professional medical and ethical obligations to their patients,” said Mark Silverstein, ACLU Legal Director. “Moreover, following the hospital’s directive deprives patients of the full information they need to make informed decisions about their medical care.”

The ACLU cited the case of Dr. Michael Demos, who has practiced cardiology for 36 years and has been working as a staff cardiologist at Mercy Regional since 2005. In early 2012, his initial medical assessment of an 8 week pregnant patient suggested the possibility of Marfan syndrome, a genetic disorder that can pose a 90% risk of death for pregnant women. In recommending a test to confirm or rule out the suspected condition, Dr. Demos also explained that the standard of care would be to recommend termination of the pregnancy if Marfan syndrome were confirmed. As it turned out, the test was negative, and the patient successfully carried the pregnancy to term.

More than a year later, the patient complained, thinking in error that hospital staff had recommended abortion. The hospital’s Chief Medical Officer, John Boyd, M.D., responded with a letter stating that pursuant to the Catholic Ethical and Religious Directives, hospital medical providers “should not recommend abortion—even to patients who may have serious illnesses.” Dr. Boyd also met with Dr. Demos and instructed him that he is not to even discuss with a Mercy Regional patient the possibility of terminating a pregnancy, no matter what the circumstances.

A Colorado statute explicitly prohibits hospitals from limiting or otherwise exercising control over a physician’s independent professional judgment concerning the practice of medicine or diagnosis or treatment. Additionally, federal regulations require hospitals that participate in Medicare and Medicaid to ensure that patients receive sufficient information to make informed decisions about their treatment options.

“By prohibiting physicians from informing patients of all alternative treatment options, Mercy Regional’s policy violates state and federal law and poses a potential threat to the health, safety, and even the lives of Mercy Regional patients,” Silverstein said.

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment sets and enforces standards for hospital operation. The ACLU has requested a response to its complaint by November 27.

For more information, visit the case page:

For the ACLU’s letter to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment:


Return to News