On behalf of the entire ACLU of Colorado Board and Staff, we would like to send a warm “thank you” to all of our attendees and sponsors for making the annual Bill of Rights dinner a complete success! We had a wonderful time and encourage you to join us in 2017 if you couldn’t make it this year.
We had a wonderful evening of celebrating civil rights and civil liberties, honoring our awardees Jessie Ulibarri, Gail Johnson and John Parvensky, and hearing an inspiring talk from our keynote speaker, Dale Ho (Director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project).

James Fisher, an ACLU client and partner in ending debtors’ prisons in Colorado, spoke passionately about the consequences of and need to reform our criminal justice system.
Take a look at some fun pictures from the celebration on our Flickr page!
nathan-constitutionjbk-group-2alejandra-and-leah-with-signs

In an effort to make sure the Bill of Rights dinner is fun and meaningful for everyone, we hope you’ll share your feedback about your experience by filling out this short survey (10 questions, takes less than 5 minutes): https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/8CR8HB3

Thank you to our 2016 sponsors!

Circle of Liberty
Killmer, Lane & Newman, LLP

Justice Council
Anonymous Recht Kornfeld PC
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

Freedom League
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
Carl J. Minnig Foundation Gleam Car Wash
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, PC
Holland & Hart LLP
Johnson, Brennan & Klein
King & Greisen LLP
Mendez Consulting
The Sawaya Law Firm
Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell

Advocate
BakerHostetler
Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center
Bob Connelly Elkind Alterman Harston PC
Lee & Sandy Mulcahy, in memory of Edward Lee “Bud” Mulcahy
University of Denver Sturm College of Law
Williams & Daley LLC
Voqal

Individual
Laurie and Chris Steuri Davis Graham & Stubbs
Wellstone Action

If you would like to sponsor the Bill of Rights dinner next year, please contact Rachel Pryor-Lease, Stewardship and Events Manager, at 720-402-3105 or [email protected].

Date

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 - 1:01pm

Featured image

frozen-matter-2

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Style

Standard with sidebar

DENVER – As ballots are being mailed out starting today to every Colorado voter, the ACLU of Colorado announced positions on three statewide initiatives and one Denver charter amendment.  The ACLU of Colorado also created a voter information page with key dates, information on registration, ballot return, and the voting rights of students, overseas voters, people who are homeless and people who are currently or have been incarcerated.
The following are the ACLU of Colorado’s official positions on the 2016 Colorado ballot: 

SUPPORT Proposition 106 – End of Life Options Act

The ACLU has historically been and remains a strong advocate for the right of individuals who are terminally ill (defined as having six months or less to live) to decide how to spend their final days, how to manage or avoid pain and suffering, and how to face death, including the right to seek physician assistance in ending one's own life.
While the ACLU supports aid in dying, it also recognizes the need for protections from abuse of these laws.  The ACLU of Colorado fully supports Proposition 106, but advocates strong reporting practices to ensure no one acts under lack of alternatives, misunderstanding or undue pressure, and the ACLU encourages all Coloradans to carefully consider the concerns of the disability community.  Under no circumstances should the lives of people with disabilities be devalued, and it should never be suggested that living with a disability means living with anything less than full meaning and dignity.
For more information, please read ACLU of Colorado Supports Aid in Dying, and As a Civil Libertarian, I Struggle with Colorado’s Aid in Dying Ballot Initiative.

OPPOSE Amendment 71 – Requirements for Initiated Constitutional Amendments

The ACLU has long maintained that fundamental Constitutional rights should not be subject to majority vote, and shares concerns that the Colorado Constitution is too easy to amend.  But Amendment 71 goes too far.  By requiring a percentage of signatures from all 35 state senate districts, Amendment 71 would essentially shut off access to a vital part of the democratic process to all but the most highly-resourced special interests.  The signature requirement would make it extremely difficult to get rid of past amendments to the Constitution, and it would give veto power to a single district to block a vote on matters of statewide significance.  Equal access for all citizens to the democratic process is an ACLU value, and for these reasons we urge voters to reject Amendment 71.
SUPPORT Amendment T – Remove Slavery from the Colorado Constitution

Even though Colorado was never a slave state, our state Constitution still contains language allowing slavery — as a punishment for crime.  Words matter and slavery in any circumstance is immoral.  Amendment T was placed on the ballot unanimously by both houses of the Colorado legislature.  By voting Yes on T, Colorado voters can remove that archaic language from our Constitution and send a clear message that whatever our criminal justice system is, it should not be slavery.
For more information, read Take Out Slavery – Vote YES on Amendment T.
SUPPORT Amendment 2B (Denver Ballot) – Include the Independent Monitor in the Denver Charter

The Office of the Independent Monitor is a critical police accountability tool that is primarily responsible to the people of Denver. The Independent Monitor currently only exists in City ordinance, which means it could easily be dissolved by the Mayor or City Council. By placing the Independent Monitor in the City Charter, it could only be removed or dissolved by a vote of the people.  The Independent Monitor would be solidified by Amendment 2B and further empowered to protect the rights of the citizens of Denver by holding law enforcement accountable.

Date

Monday, October 17, 2016 - 11:35am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Voting Rights

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Style

Standard with sidebar

This year, Colorado voters will be asked to either support or reject Proposition 106, the Colorado “End-of-Life Options Act."
After “Aid in Dying” bills were introduced three times in the Colorado legislature without success, enough signatures were gathered to put Proposition 106 on the ballot.  If approved by voters, it will add the proposed Act to our state code; it is not a constitutional amendment.  The ACLU of Colorado supports Proposition 106.
The ACLU has historically been and remains a strong advocate for the right of individuals who are terminally ill (defined as having six months or less to live) to decide how to spend their final days, how to manage or avoid pain and suffering, and how to face death, including the right to seek physician assistance in ending one's own life. Five states now permit physician assistance in dying. Those states are Oregon, California, Washington, Vermont, and Montana. The ACLU of New Mexico is engaged in litigation on behalf of an individual who seeks to establish aid in dying as a constitutional right.
While the ACLU supports aid in dying, it also recognizes the need for protections from abuse of these laws.  The ACLU also supports the decision to keep living despite a terminal illness and in particular wishes to uphold a culture of respect for those who are living with disabilities.  Many disability groups oppose aid in dying laws, even with safeguards. The ACLU of Colorado has chosen to maintain its support for aid in dying laws, but encourages all Coloradans to carefully consider the concerns of the disability community.  Under no circumstances should the lives of people with disabilities be devalued, and it should never be suggested that living with a disability means living with anything less than full meaning and dignity.
The ACLU advocates for safeguards in aid in dying policy, including patient access to palliative care and information about pain medication and other alternatives. There also must be demonstrated assurance that the decision to end one's life is neither pressured nor coerced.  In addition, the law should provide a mechanism to evaluate that it is working as it is supposed to work.
Proposition 106 appears to sufficiently address these safeguards. There is a requirement for a second opinion on the diagnosis of a terminal illness.  Attending Physicians are required to provide information on alternatives and the availability of palliative care, and every patient must be provided the right and opportunity to rescind an aid in dying request.  To ensure that requests for medication are not coerced, the initiative requires that a patient make two requests for the medication, one of which must be in writing and witnessed by two people. These witnesses must attest to the person's mental capacity and that the person is acting voluntarily. The initiative imposes documentation and reporting requirements on the Attending Physician, overseen by the Department of Public Health and Environment.  In implementing Proposition 106, strict adherence to the reporting requirements is critical to ensure the effectiveness of these safeguards.
The ACLU of Colorado affirms the rights of people facing end-of-life decisions, while urging awareness and consideration of the concerns of people living with disabilities.
See also, As a Civil Libertarian, I Struggle with Colorado's Aid in Dying Ballot Initiative by ACLU of Colorado Staff Attorney Rebecca T. Wallace.

Date

Monday, October 17, 2016 - 9:52am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU Colorado RSS