The case of Weld County District Attorney Ken Buck's illegal search and seizure of private tax files from a Greeley tax preparer in 2008 is over. District Court Judge Stephen Schapanski drove the final nail in the coffin of the Weld DA and Sheriff's unconstitutional 2008 search of Amalia's Translation &  Tax Service.

Despite having reason to suspect only a single customer, deputies took 49 file boxes containing the tax returns and related information pertaining to nearly 5,000 clients.The ACLU filed a lawsuit on behalf of business owner Amalia Cerillo and several of clients, asserting that their privacy rights were violated. Numerous judges, including the Colorado Supreme Court, agreed. 

This last ruling by Judge Schapanski orders that the temporary injunction issued in April of 2009 be made permanent. This ruling  directs the Weld County clerk to destroy all copies of information obtained from the illegal search and seizure of tax files from Amalia's Translation & Tax Service. Furthermore, Weld County authorities are forbidden from using or acting upon any information learned from the contents of those files.

More on this case

Date

Wednesday, December 22, 2010 - 9:45pm

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Legal Reform Immigrant Justice Privacy & Technology

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

In these tough economic times, with so many Coloradans looking for work, who doesn’t dream of landing a cushy government job? One such position could be working as a censor for the Motor Vehicle Division of the Colorado Department of Revenue.

The job description: determine whether proposed vanity plates should be approved or rejected.

The only criteria for your decisions: whether the proposed combination of letters and numbers
“carry connotations offensive to good taste and decency.”

Sounds easy, but it’s harder than you may think. Consider tofu. One Coloradan liked everyone’s favorite soy product enough to pay extra to proclaim her passion on a vanity plate. While “I love tofu” seems harmless enough, a vigilant Colorado DMV employee spotted a potential threat to public morals and averted near-disaster by rejecting the plate. If you had been on the job, would you have been as vigilant?

Being an official state censor requires a well-refined sensitivity to nuance and subtle distinctions. Consider the examples below. Each pair depicts a plate that veteran Colorado censors rejected as offensive to good taste and decency next to a very similar plate that was approved. If the distinction seems as mysterious to you as it does to us, you might need to look for a different line of work.

If you know which of the plates above were approved and which were banned, you're ready to play:

Who Wants To Be A Colorado DMV Censor?

In April of 2009, we requested lists of all plates, both approved and denied. The only stated criteria: whether the proposed combination of letters and numbers “carry connotations offensive to good taste and decency.” The data, however, was puzzling.

TOOSEXY was rejected, but 2SEXY was approved. TOPLE55 was turned down, but TOPLESS was allowed. GANJA was denied, but PEYOTE was OK. See a pattern here? Neither did we.

Click here to see a list of our favorite pairings

Here are the complete lists of plates:

Accepted plates

Rejected plates

Date

Friday, December 10, 2010 - 5:55pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Government Transparency Freedom of Expression & Religion

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU Colorado RSS