Bill Number: HB14-1032
ACLU Position: Support
Sponsors: Kagan, Guzman
Juvenile Defense Attorney Interim Committee. A promise to appear in court served upon a juvenile and the juvenile’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian shall state, in clear language that is understandable and appropriate to a juvenile:
• That the juvenile has the right to have counsel;
• That counsel will be appointed for the juvenile if the juvenile or the juvenile’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian lacks adequate resources to retain counsel or refuses to retain counsel for the juvenile;
• That, if the juvenile chooses to retain his or her own counsel, then the juvenile and the juvenile’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian are advised to choose counsel that is experienced in representing juveniles in the juvenile justice system; and
• The contact information for the local office of the state public defender (OSPD).
When a juvenile is placed in a detention facility, a temporary holding facility, or a shelter facility designated by the court, the screening team shall promptly so notify the court, the district attorney, and the local office of the OSPD. A juvenile who is detained shall be represented at the detention hearing by counsel. If the juvenile has not retained his or her own counsel, he or she shall be represented by the OSPD or, in the case of a conflict, by the office of alternate defense counsel (OADC). This representation shall continue unless:
• The juvenile retains his or her own counsel; or
• The juvenile is charged with an offense for which the juvenile may waive counsel and the juvenile has made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of his or her right to counsel.
The scheduled time for a detention hearing must allow a juvenile’s defense counsel sufficient time to consult with the juvenile before the detention hearing. This consultation may be performed by secure electronic means if the conditions under which the electronic consultation is held allow the consultation to be confidential. The law enforcement agency that arrested the juvenile shall promptly provide to the court and to defense counsel the affidavit supporting probable cause for the arrest and the arrest report, if the arrest report is available, and the screening team shall promptly provide to the court and to defense counsel any screening material prepared pursuant to the juvenile’s arrest.
A detention hearing shall not be combined with a preliminary hearing or a first advisement. Due to the limited scope of a detention hearing, the representation of a juvenile by appointed counsel at a detention hearing does not, by itself, create a conflict in the event that such counsel is subsequently appointed to represent another individual whose case is related to the juvenile’s case.
A summons issued by a court to a juvenile shall:
• Explain that the court will appoint counsel for the juvenile if the juvenile does not retain his or her own counsel; and
• State the contact information for the OSPD that serves the jurisdiction of the court.
At a juvenile’s first appearance before the court, after the detention hearing or at the first appearance if the juvenile appears on a summons, the court shall advise the juvenile of his or her constitutional and legal rights, including the right to counsel. The court shall appoint the OSPD or, in the case of a conflict, the OADC for the juvenile unless the juvenile has retained his or her own counsel or the juvenile has made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of his or her right to counsel.
Any decision to waive the right to counsel shall be made by the juvenile himself or herself after consulting with his or her defense counsel. The court may accept a waiver of counsel by a juvenile only after finding that:
• The juvenile is of a sufficient maturity level to make a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel;
• The juvenile has consulted with counsel and understands the sentencing options that will be available to the court in the event of an adjudication or conviction;
• The juvenile has not been coerced into making the waiver;
• The juvenile understands that the court will provide counsel if the juvenile’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian is unable or unwilling to obtain counsel for the juvenile;
• The juvenile understands the possible consequences that may result from an adjudication or conviction of the offense with which the juvenile is charged.
The court shall not accept a juvenile’s waiver of his or her right to counsel in any proceeding relating to a case in which the juvenile is charged with:
• A sexual offense;
• A crime of violence;
• An offense for which the juvenile will receive a mandatory sentence upon his or her conviction of the offense; or
• An offense for which the juvenile is being charged as a repeat juvenile offender, as an aggravated juvenile offender, or as a mandatory sentence offender.
The court shall not accept a juvenile’s attempt to waive his or her right to counsel if the prosecuting attorney is seeking direct file proceedings or a transfer proceeding or if the juvenile is in the custody of the state department of human services or a county department of social services.
For purposes of applying for court-appointed counsel, the indigence of a juvenile is determined only by considering the juvenile’s assets and income.
The appointment of counsel for a juvenile offender shall continue until the court’s jurisdiction is terminated, the juvenile or the juvenile’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian retains counsel for the juvenile, or the juvenile makes a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of his or her right to counsel.
A court shall not deem a guardian ad litem who is appointed by the court for a child in a delinquency proceeding to be a substitute for defense counsel for the juvenile.
The OSPD, before determining indigency, may provide limited representation to juveniles in detention hearings or adult defendants in custody who cannot post or are not allowed bond.
The OSPD, the OADC, and the judicial branch shall annually report certain data concerning juvenile delinquency proceedings.
05/02/2014 - House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
04/29/2014 - Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
04/23/2014 - Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Appropriations
04/15/2014 - Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
04/15/2014 - House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
02/27/2014 - House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations
01/08/2014 - Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
Return to Search Menu