Colorado Rights Blog


  • Anthony Martinez is 84-years-old and suffering from renal failure, as well as other serious medical conditions including dementia. He is currently incarcerated in the Sterling Correctional Facility, site of one of Colorado’s largest COVID-19 outbreaks with almost 600 active COVID-19 cases. He and his family are understandably terrified that he will catch the virus and die.

    In the midst of this public health crisis, incarcerated people as vulnerable as Anthony, could and should be immediately released to safely live out their remaining years with family.

    Read more about Anthony Martinez and other at-risk incarcerated people. 

  • Ronald Johnson is pre-diabetic, suffers from asthma and high blood pressure, and regularly uses an inhaler to breathe. His age and respiratory ailments put him at risk of serious illness and death if he contracts COVID-19. With over hundreds of active cases in Colorado’s prisons, his family fears he will not make it out alive. His daughter, Amber, says, “In prison, he can’t protect himself and he can’t social distance. My deep fear is that my dad will die in prison. That is an awful, traumatic reality to consider. My chest is tight just thinking about how quickly it spreads and how vulnerable he is.”

    Governor Hickenlooper shortened his sentence following testimony from family, friends and correctional officers advocating for his early release. Yet, he is still eight years away from parole. While he remains in prison, COVID-19 continues to spread. Ronald’s three siblings, four children and four grandchildren are desperate for his release.

    Read more about Ronald Johnson and other at-risk incarcerated people.

  • Tuesday Olson knew her pregnancy was in trouble and tried to access hospital care as soon as possible. But there was a problem: she was in jail. This is her story.
  • It’s time to end the death penalty in Colorado. Family members who lost loved ones to murder speak out against an unjust and broken system.

ACLU applauds Boulder Valley School District

A spokesperson for the ACLU of Colorado announced today that it welcomes a decision of the Boulder Valley School District (“BVSD”) to limit searches of students’ cell phone text messages, an issue the ACLU raised in a letter made public in October, 2007. In that letter, the ACLU asserted that non-consensual searches of text messages violate a Colorado criminal statute designed to protect the privacy of telephone and electronic communications.

New guidelines state that before searching text messages, BVSD administrators must not only satisfy the minimum federal constitutional standard for conducting a search, but must also obtain the consent of the student or parent. The only exception is an emergency in which there is an imminent threat to public safety.

“I commend the Boulder Valley School District for making a decision that protects students’ privacy and addresses the concerns raised in the ACLU’s letter,” said Mark Silverstein, ACLU Legal Director. “Meetings with the school district’s attorneys and ACLU representatives have been cordial and very productive.”

The Colorado statute makes it a crime to read, copy, or record a telephone or electronic communication without the consent of the sender or receiver. The ACLU’s October letter asserted that administrators at Monarch High School in Louisville had been violating the statute by seizing students cell phones; reading the text messages; transcribing messages administrators regarded as incriminating; and placing some transcriptions in students’ permanent files.

Silverstein noted that the BVSD attorneys do not agree that the Colorado statute applies to the cell phone searches criticized in the ACLU’s letter. Nevertheless, he said, by ensuring that administrators will now obtain consent before conducting a search, the potential conflict with the statute is largely resolved.

Silverstein said that BVSD also will add a sentence to its “Student Rights and Responsibilities Guide” that says: “Except in cases of emergency, a cell phone or other electronic communication device will not be searched without the consent of either the student or parent.”

In addition, administrators will fill out a one-page pre-printed checklist when a cell phone is searched. “The checklist functions as a written reminder to administrators of the minimum standards that must be met before searching a student’s cell phone,” Silverstein said. “It also reminds administrators that they can consult with the BVSD’s legal counsel in close cases.”

“Students’ use of newer electronic devices pose a potential challenge for school administrators who must enforce school rules and ensure students’ safety while also respecting their right of privacy,” Silverstein said. “The new guidelines BVSD has adopted represent a substantial step toward reaching an appropriate balance. I have nothing but praise for BVSD’s willingness to discuss the ACLU’s concerns and to make these changes.”

In addition to Silverstein, ACLU attorneys who met with BVSD attorneys included Taylor Pendergrass, ACLU Staff Attorney, and ACLU Cooperating Attorney Michael Rollin. 

Return to News